FR EN DE ES IT PT
Browse forums 
Ankama Trackers

Sacrier Beta Changes

By SmuglyDuckling - SUBSCRIBER - September 18, 2019, 21:35:24

I feel like I may be misunderstanding the proposed Sacrier changes for the upcoming beta according to the dev post.

I really appreciate that the self-casting mechanic is being removed for the listed and obvious reasons: it's needlessly taxing and chokes out multi-elemental builds. I also LIKE the idea of replacing the vitality malus with some other form of penalty, even bringing back self-damage is an interesting idea...

I just don't feel like I understand a situation in which you'd ever want to use the new options. At what point are they ever worth casting, compared to any alternative spell (that doesn't inflict self harm)? Even as a mechanism to reduce your own health voluntarily, opponents fulfill that role more than adequately; and where they don't, the extra damage simply isn't necessary.

The damage on the self-inflicting moves is so low for their penalty, it appears to me that you would almost always be better off casting a life-stealing alternative. This is especially true in the cases of Strength and Agility, whose single target self-wounding attacks are now among the worst among all classes. The damage certainly ramps up as the Sacrier loses health, but the point is that so do all your other attacks! They improve at exactly the same rate. Even when you aren't taking the damage from your own spells anymore--at higher Suffering values--the lack of life steal for a 15% increase in damage feels like an unfavorable trade-off.

An interesting alternative would be that, for example, at 100% health you inflict some (25%) of the damage on the enemy and take most (75%) of the damage yourself. As your health decreases, the distribution tilts in your favor--you take less of the damage and the opponent takes more. The total damage remains the same, but it is just inflicted more-so against the opponent as the Sac gets closer to death (and the base damage value would, of course, be higher).

I'll be interested to see how it feels in practice, but my initial impression is that I'll have a very empty hotbar in the near future.
 

4 0
Reply
Reactions 4
Score : 199

agreed

0 0
Reply
Score : 450

After some testing, I can see that things are much worse than I expected. It is no exaggeration that the beta version of the Sacrier is unplayable using the newly modified spells.

The amount of damage I'm dealing to myself is so high compared to the amount inflicted, I can't even kill the 10,000 hp poutch without killing myself, using Clobbering 2x each turn, Stasis once (even recovering some life!). The idea is basically absurd, considering that this is an enemy that can't even fight back!

The self-damage curve is extremely unfavorable; the rate at which it decreases as your life decreases is barely noticeable. These spells are so far beyond worthless that they actually hinder you with their use.

I think that the ultimate evidence of the extremely poor execution of this idea is in the fact that you take additional damage if you are in your own AoE. In what way is it feasible to do more damage to yourself than to the enemy with your own attack, regardless of your life total? If these changes were to go live, the only playable Sacrier would consist of "Bloodbath, Bloodbath, pass."

I mean this in all sincerity: This is the worst version of the Sacrier that has ever existed.

5 0
Reply
Score : 69

how's the situation now? i'm comming back to dofus and would like to play sacrier, if he's playable

0 0
Reply
Score : 450

They've decided to go ahead with the changes from the Beta server to the Live server, claiming that there was "not enough feedback....." Never-mind the hundreds of forum posts from players who unanimously agreed that the reworked spells are unusable trash (see french forums).

I would 100% avoid the Sac until they decide what they're going to do with it. It is currently a completely ill-considered wreck and, if the communication from the devs is any indication, it's not going to get better any time soon.

 

2 0
Respond to this thread